Ed's Site


Computers and Tech


Pics / Pets


Made with vi. The RIGHT way!

Hacker Emblem

NecroBones.net rackmount goodness.
My "mainframe" boxen. (July 2006)

The image to the left is my beastly box of technology, my Mainframe (technically it is a mainframe, since the rack is the "main" frame). It's not the fastest equipment, but it does the job and looks pretty. Even though some of this hardware is a bit on the old side, it's still overkill compared to most of the tasks that these machines are asked to perform.

This is the only environment in which I can truly get away with being a BOFH if I want to. :-) [definition] (They tend to frown on that sort of thing in the work-place)

Despite the relative obsolescence of most of this hardware, it it still lightyears beyond the 286 my BBS ran on.

Notice the "zen boxes". I originally heard the term in college; I have no idea where it originated. I've enjoyed using the term for my blinkenlights for many years now.

Blinkenlights, Click to order!
Click here to get Blinkenlights stuff!


According to The Jargon File, "boxen" is defined as:

Fanciful plural of box often encountered in the phrase 'Unix boxen', used to describe commodity Unix hardware.


I know to many of you this'll seem pretty geeky... to others, it'll seem rather dull and ho-hum, or even unimpresive. But just like pet-owners or car enthusiasts, we computer geeks can be rather proud of our chosen passion, even when we haven't invested much money.

I've been into computers to some degree for about 20 years as of this writing, though admittedly early on I was just a kid playing with Basic and a handful of small DOS-based games on an original IBM PC with a 4.77MHz 8088 CPU.

One of the remaining driving forces for me to keep upgrading hardware these days is games, since unlike years ago, other applications aren't quite as dependant on hardware limitations.

However, with periodic upgrades of my main desktop PC, I've always used the left-over parts to build additional machines. In turn, these other boxen have benefitted from the hand-me-down parts with additional upgrades to my workstation. As a result, I have a large number of machines, but they cross the spectrum of the history of my upgrades, and vary in obsolescence.

Even so, they remain useful under linux, and in many cases are still under-utilized. Currently, the slowest "server" in the rack is a dual Pentium2 450MHz machine, which sits idle most of the time. There's an even slower one in there too, but it's not a server. It's configured for DOS, and is merely a 200MHz Pentium-MMX. Also, the box that acts as the network router "appliance" and firewall is a 300MHz Celeron.

I take great amusement, however, in knowing that even my slower computers, as old and obsolete as they are now compared to current PC hardware, stack up quite nicely in comparison to the super-computers I read about as a kid. Compare the following, for example:

The first Cray-1 Supercomputer, Installed in Los Alamos in 1976:

  • Speed: 133 MFLOPS (peak 250) / 160 MIPS
  • 80 MHz CPU Clock
  • 64-bit Word Size
  • 8 Megabytes RAM (50 ns)
  • Weight: 5.5 Tons including cooling
  • Power: 115 kW excluding cooling
  • Cost: $8.8-Million in 1976 dollars, excluding the disks
   My aging 200-MHz Pentium-MMX (from roughly 1996):

  • Speed: Approximately 25-80 MFLOPS? 200 MIPS?
         (estimates, hard to research)
  • 200 MHz CPU Clock
  • 32-bit Word Size
  • 96 Megabytes RAM (probably 16 originally)
  • Cost: Given to me for free, since it was already obsolete

As you can see, the 200MHz Pentium would have to work longer to accomplish the same tasks as a Cray-1 (particularly when you take into account the optimizations that the Cray had for mathematical and scientific data processing), but similar tasks are within it's reach. At the time that the Pentium was produced, 96 MB of RAM would have been a luxury; However 16 or 32 MB would have been fairly common. I remember using about 48MB in my 150MHz machine for a while before upgrading to a new processor class.

The Cray-1 had over 200,000 logic gates, roughly similar to the Intel 386 from the 1980s. However, the Cray-1's logic was constructed with simple NAND ICs, without a microprocessor chip. (see more on wikipedia).

Yesterday's supercomputer, today's desktop, tomorrow's trash. :)


I've debated with myself over how much information to divulge about the nature of my network and my machines, and have waffled back and forth on it. Recently I ended up password-protecting some of my online status pages, but I figure there's not much harm in showing how obsolete my equipment is. :)

There's also probably little harm in a simple Network Diagram.

When you're supporting the network needs of a single person using linux, you generally don't need much hardware at all. Granted, I'm burning more electricity with the multiplicity of hardware, but older machines that are idle will also draw a lot less power than more powerful machines that will be even more idle, even though the newer performance-per-watt figures are superior. The older machines generally had lower idle power consumption.

Typically not pictured here are Liche and Vampire (desktops).


  • Xen Guest on Banshee (Slackware)
  • Network Services: DHCP, SMTP, HTTP, POP
  • DNS Auth/NS Server
  • DNS Caching Resolver
  • Primary File Server, NFS/SMB, 2+ TB raw storage
  • Weather Station
  • UPS Monitor for rack
  • Configuration manager for LAN, DNS, Router, etc


  • Intel Core i5 750
  • Xen Host (CentOS)
  • Secondary log host
  • DNS Auth/NS Server


  • Xen Guest on Banshee (Windows XP)
  • Windows Server
       Weather Radar
       Music Server (iTunes for Roku)


  • Intel Core 2 Quad
  • Windows Workstaton


  • Cisco 2621 Router

Significantly out of date (2009):


  • [2024.01] Core i7-14700k + Gigabyte Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX LGA 1700 (2x CORSAIR Vengeance 96GB (2x48GB) DDR5-6600)
  • [2020.09] Core i7-10700k + ASUS Tuf Gaming Z490 Plus LGA 1200 (2x GSKILL F4-3600C18D-64GVK 64GB (2x32GB) DDR4-3600) [desktop -> server]
  • [2020.07] Server: Core i7-9800X + ASUS Prime X299-A II LGA 2066 (2x CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 64GB (2 x 32GB) DDR4-3600) [server]
  • [2018.10] Server: Core i7-8700 + Asus Prime H370-Plus (1x CORSAIR Vengeance CMU64GX4M4A2666C16R 64GB (4x16GB) DDR4-2666MHz) [server]
  • [2017.04] Core i7-7700k + Gigabyte Z270X-Ultra Gaming (1x CORSAIR CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4-3200MHz)
  • [2014.04] Core i7-4770k + Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H (1x CORSAIR CMY16GX3M2A2133C11 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3-2133)
  • [2010.12] Core i7-950 + Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R (1x CORSAIR TR3X6G1600C8 G 6GB (3x2GB) DDR3-1600) [desktop -> server]
  • [2009.11] Server: Core i5 + Asus P7P55D EVO (1x CORSAIR CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 4GB (2x2GB) PC3-12800 (DDR3-1600)) [server]
  • [2007.06] Core 2 Quad + Asus P35 P5K (2x Corsair TWIN2X2048-6400 2GB Kit)
  • [2006.07] Sempron/AM2 3000 + Gigabyte GA-M55plus-S3G (2x 512MB DDR2/667 PC2-5300)
  • [2006.05] Server: Opteron 242 (upgraded to 2x 270 later) + Asus K8N-DL nForce4 Pro (2x Kingston KVR400X72C3A/512 512MB DDR400 PC3200 CL3 ECC) [server]
  • [2004.02] P4 3.2 GHz + Asus P4P800 (1x Corsair TWINX1024-3200LLPRO 1GB Kit DDR400 XMS3200)

(1024x768 or better resolution is recommended for this site)

All content Copyright © Ed T. Toton III, All Rights Reserved.
Any and all unauthorized duplication of any content in whole or in part is strictly forbidden.

(A NecroBones® Website)
(NecroBones® is a registered trademark of Ed T. Toton III)